Xeon E-2488 vs Core i5-3475S
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E-2488 outperforms i5-3475S by a whopping 598% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1622 | 276 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.42 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Raptor Lake-S |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 (12 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | no data |
| Current price | $69 (0.3x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1155 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i5-3475S by 598% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i5-3475S by 599% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.76 | 19.26 |
| Recency | 1 June 2012 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
i5-3475S has 46.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 597.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3475S in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-3475S is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3475S and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
