Ryzen 5 7500F vs i5-3365M
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 370 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 November 2012 (11 years ago) | 22 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2012 | 22 July 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-3365M has 85.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7500F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-3365M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 7500F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3365M and Ryzen 5 7500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
