Athlon XP 1700+ vs i5-3335S
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1774 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 3.45 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) |
| Release date | 1 November 2012 (12 years ago) | October 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 160 mm2 | 150 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,480 million | 37 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1155 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 64 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 64 Watt |
i5-3335S has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 718.2% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP 1700+, on the other hand, has 1.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3335S and Athlon XP 1700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
