Core i7-11700 vs Core i5-3317U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3317U
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.30
Core i7-11700
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
12.79
+884%

i7-11700 outperforms i5-3317U by a whopping 884% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2182559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.60
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$524 (2.3x MSRP)$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel UHD Graphics 750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3317U 1.30
i7-11700 12.79
+884%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 884% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-3317U 2015
i7-11700 19788
+882%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 882% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3317U 400
i7-11700 2106
+427%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 427% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3317U 805
i7-11700 8611
+970%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 970% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-3317U 3488
i7-11700 9493
+172%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 172% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-3317U 7337
i7-11700 51493
+602%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 602% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-3317U 2985
i7-11700 14738
+394%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 394% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i5-3317U 22.39
i7-11700 4.19
+434%

Core i5-3317U outperforms Core i7-11700 by 434% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-3317U 2
i7-11700 20
+734%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 734% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-3317U 1.05
i7-11700 2.77
+164%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 164% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-3317U 1.2
i7-11700 12
+900%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 900% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-3317U 2274
i7-11700 5962
+162%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 162% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-3317U 14
i7-11700 93
+580%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 580% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i5-3317U 74
i7-11700 267
+263%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Core i5-3317U by 263% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 12.79
Integrated graphics card 1.18 4.49
Recency 1 June 2012 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-11700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3317U in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-3317U is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3317U and Core i7-11700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3317U
Core i5-3317U
Intel Core i7-11700
Core i7-11700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 280 votes

Rate Core i5-3317U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 817 votes

Rate Core i7-11700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3317U or Core i7-11700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.