Ryzen 7 8840HS vs i5-3230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3230M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.66
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.85
+855%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms i5-3230M by a whopping 855% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2051432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache3 MB16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size118 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3230M 1.66
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.85
+855%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3230M 2563
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24514
+856%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-3230M 507
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2006
+296%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-3230M 1023
Ryzen 7 8840HS 8790
+759%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-3230M 258
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2111
+718%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-3230M 105
Ryzen 7 8840HS 265
+152%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 15.85
Integrated graphics card 1.18 18.31
Recency 1 January 2013 6 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840HS has a 854.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1451.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3230M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3230M and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3230M
Core i5-3230M
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1072 votes

Rate Core i5-3230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 114 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3230M or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.