Atom C3338 vs i5-2550K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2550K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.70
+303%

Core i5-2550K outperforms Atom C3338 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17142744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.650.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.596.79
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateJanuary 2012 (12 years ago)22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-2550K has 2650% better value for money than Atom C3338.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C89 °C
Number of transistors1160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155,LGA1155FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Quick Sync Video+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes1610
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data10
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data10
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2550K 2.70
+303%
Atom C3338 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2550K 4134
+302%
Atom C3338 1028

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 0.67
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 8 Watt

i5-2550K has a 303% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom C3338, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1087.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2550K is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3338 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2550K is a desktop processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2550K and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2550K
Core i5-2550K
Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 154 votes

Rate Core i5-2550K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2550K or Atom C3338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.