Celeron 3215U vs i5-13400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.60
+2047%
Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68

Core i5-13400 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 2047% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4852722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.29no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency21.264.29
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$221$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache80K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size192 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.55 GHz850 MHz
Execution Units24no data
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400 14.60
+2047%
Celeron 3215U 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400 23192
+2041%
Celeron 3215U 1083

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400 2297
+592%
Celeron 3215U 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400 10194
+1634%
Celeron 3215U 588

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.60 0.68
Recency 4 January 2023 1 June 2015
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

i5-13400 has a 2047.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 400% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 3215U, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-13400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-13400 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3215U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400 and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1078 votes

Rate Core i5-13400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400 or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.