Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs i5-1034G1
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-1034G1 outperforms Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1131 | 1652 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 35.96 | 7.90 |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Dali (2020) |
| Release date | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.70 | 2.92 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.13 | 2.98 |
| Recency | 29 May 2019 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
i5-1034G1 has a 95.2% higher aggregate performance score, 5% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Core i5-1034G1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-1034G1 is a notebook processor while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1034G1 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
