i7-11375H vs i5-1030NG7

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-1030NG7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 10 Watt
3.59
Core i7-11375H
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.45
+108%

Core i7-11375H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1503968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice Lakeno data
Power efficiency33.9725.18
Architecture codenameIce Lake-Y (2020)Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
Release date18 March 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$482

Detailed specifications

Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s4 GT/s
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size123 mm2146.1 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1044FCBGA1449,FCLGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4-3733DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth58.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.35 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportYes, at 120Hzno data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hz7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-1030NG7 3.59
i7-11375H 7.45
+108%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-1030NG7 5695
i7-11375H 11832
+108%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-1030NG7 1314
i7-11375H 1790
+36.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-1030NG7 3359
i7-11375H 5311
+58.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-1030NG7 448
i7-11375H 929
+107%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-1030NG7 140
i7-11375H 230
+64.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-1030NG7 2710
i7-11375H 6098
+125%

Blender(-)

i5-1030NG7 1310
+177%
i7-11375H 473

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-1030NG7 1089
i7-11375H 1648
+51.4%

7-Zip Single

i5-1030NG7 3472
i7-11375H 5565
+60.3%

7-Zip

i5-1030NG7 10924
i7-11375H 28441
+160%

WebXPRT 3

i5-1030NG7 159
i7-11375H 249
+57.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.59 7.45
Recency 18 March 2020 11 January 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 28 Watt

i5-1030NG7 has 180% lower power consumption.

i7-11375H, on the other hand, has a 107.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Core i7-11375H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1030NG7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1030NG7 and Core i7-11375H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-1030NG7
Core i5-1030NG7
Intel Core i7-11375H
Core i7-11375H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 40 votes

Rate Core i5-1030NG7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 44 votes

Rate Core i7-11375H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-1030NG7 or Core i7-11375H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.