Celeron G470 vs i3-9100F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1372not rated
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency6.17no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)no data
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency-1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-9100F 6733
+1081%
Celeron G470 570

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 1 April 2013
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i3-9100F has an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G470, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100F and Celeron G470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F
Intel Celeron G470
Celeron G470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 7014 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 14 votes

Rate Celeron G470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100F or Celeron G470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.