A6-9220C vs i3-8020
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2734 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Bristol Ridge |
Power efficiency | no data | 10.49 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | no data | 18 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 126 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | 1151 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 14.936 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 1.48 |
Recency | 1 September 2018 | 6 January 2019 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 6 Watt |
i3-8020 has 108.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A6-9220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 750% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-8020 is a desktop processor while A6-9220C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8020 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.