Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs i3-8000
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 538 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 7.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | 1151 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2424 ‑ 3696 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2018 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 2424 Watt |
i3-8000 has 3629.2% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-8000 is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8000 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
