i5-6442EQ vs i3-7102E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.63
Core i5-6442EQ
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.91
+78.5%

i5-6442EQ outperforms i3-7102E by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20651644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.310.35
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-6442EQ has 13% better value for money than i3-7102E.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2119
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data122 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.63
i5-6442EQ 2.91
+78.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2521
i5-6442EQ 4487
+78%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 2.91
Integrated graphics card 3.10 2.60
Recency 3 January 2017 12 October 2015
Physical cores 2 4

i3-7102E has 19.2% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.

i5-6442EQ, on the other hand, has a 78.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core i5-6442EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-7102E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and Core i5-6442EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
Core i5-6442EQ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-6442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or Core i5-6442EQ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.