A8-5500 vs i3-7102E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.64
A8-5500
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.64

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and A8-5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20732072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency6.212.39
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and A8-5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and A8-5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFM2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and A8-5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and A8-5500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and A8-5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon HD 7560D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and A8-5500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.64
A8-5500 1.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
A8-5500 2609
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 3.10 1.18
Recency 3 January 2017 2 October 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

i3-7102E has 162.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

A8-5500, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-7102E and A8-5500.

Be aware that Core i3-7102E is a notebook processor while A8-5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and A8-5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
AMD A8-5500
A8-5500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 336 votes

Rate A8-5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or A8-5500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.