A6-9500E vs i3-7102E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.67
+47.8%
A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.13

Core i3-7102E outperforms A6-9500E by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20712396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency6.203.00
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7102E 1.67
+47.8%
A6-9500E 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
+48%
A6-9500E 1756

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 1.13
Recency 3 January 2017 27 July 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

i3-7102E has a 47.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

The Core i3-7102E is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-7102E is a notebook processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7102E and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 48 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7102E or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.