Celeron N2810 vs Core i3-6006U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2077not rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date11 November 2016 (7 years ago)11 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$260
Current price$452 (1.6x MSRP)$150 (0.6x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size99 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
Smart Connectno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 520Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency900 MHz756 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes124
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-6006U 2282
+443%
Celeron N2810 420

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 443% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-6006U 646
+328%
Celeron N2810 151

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 328% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-6006U 1329
+385%
Celeron N2810 274

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 385% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-6006U 3227
+225%
Celeron N2810 993

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 225% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-6006U 7364
+400%
Celeron N2810 1474

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 400% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-6006U 24.3
+161%
Celeron N2810 63.4

Celeron N2810 outperforms Core i3-6006U by 161% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-6006U 2
+232%
Celeron N2810 1

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 232% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-6006U 215
+264%
Celeron N2810 59

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 264% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-6006U 84
+169%
Celeron N2810 31

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 169% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-6006U 0.96
+159%
Celeron N2810 0.37

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 159% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-6006U 1.2
+991%
Celeron N2810 0.1

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 991% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-6006U 1808
+166%
Celeron N2810 680

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 166% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-6006U 14
+231%
Celeron N2810 4

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 231% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-6006U 75
+226%
Celeron N2810 23

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 226% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-6006U 4384
+230%
Celeron N2810 1328

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 230% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-6006U 2012
+164%
Celeron N2810 762

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 164% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-6006U 4501
+137%
Celeron N2810 1898

Core i3-6006U outperforms Celeron N2810 by 137% in Geekbench 2.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2016 11 September 2013
Threads 4 2
Cost $281 $260
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6006U and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6006U
Core i3-6006U
Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1282 votes

Rate Core i3-6006U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 30 votes

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6006U or Celeron N2810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.