Celeron M 410 vs i3-550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bit32 Bit
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-550 1609
+1208%
Celeron M 410 123

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 27 Watt

i3-550 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 410, on the other hand, has 170.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-550 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 410 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-550 and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-550
Core i3-550
Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 421 vote

Rate Core i3-550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-550 or Celeron M 410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.