Pentium 4 630 vs i3-540

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2483not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataPentium 4
Power efficiency1.26no data
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Prescott 2M
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate2.5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C67 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-540 1538
+465%
Pentium 4 630 272

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 84 Watt

i3-540 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-540 and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-540
Core i3-540
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 665 votes

Rate Core i3-540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-540 or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.