E-350 vs Core i3-530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-530 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2399not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data
Current price$32 (0.5x MSRP)$268

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-530 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size81 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-530 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FT1
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-530 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2DDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-530 and E-350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-530 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-530 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 6310
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-530 and E-350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-530 and E-350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-530 1496
+255%
E-350 421

Core i3-530 outperforms E-350 by 255% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-530 362
+248%
E-350 104

Core i3-530 outperforms E-350 by 248% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-530 754
+317%
E-350 181

Core i3-530 outperforms E-350 by 317% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2011
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i3-530 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-530 is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-530 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 401 vote

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 373 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-530 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.