Celeron J1800 vs i3-4170T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1904not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.47no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date30 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$72

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz792 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4170T 3218
+462%
Celeron J1800 573

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2015 1 November 2013
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

i3-4170T has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-4170T is a desktop processor while Celeron J1800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4170T and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4170T
Core i3-4170T
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 40 votes

Rate Core i3-4170T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 531 vote

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4170T or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.