Xeon E3-1205 v6 vs i3-4160

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4160
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.30
Xeon E3-1205 v6
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.71
+61.3%

Xeon E3-1205 v6 outperforms Core i3-4160 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18271506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.374.93
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E3
Power efficiency3.885.20
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)28 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$133$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1205 v6 has 1232% better value for money than i3-4160.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.55V-1.52V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400Intel HD Graphics P630
Max video memory2 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2160@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60HzN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/1212
OpenGL4.34.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4160 2.30
Xeon E3-1205 v6 3.71
+61.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4160 3517
Xeon E3-1205 v6 5682
+61.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.30 3.71
Integrated graphics card 1.35 3.10
Recency 21 July 2014 28 March 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

i3-4160 has 20.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E3-1205 v6, on the other hand, has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score, 129.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E3-1205 v6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4160 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4160 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1205 v6 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4160 and Xeon E3-1205 v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4160
Core i3-4160
Intel Xeon E3-1205 v6
Xeon E3-1205 v6

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 891 vote

Rate Core i3-4160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1205 v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4160 or Xeon E3-1205 v6, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.