Celeron 2957U vs i3-4160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4160
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.22
+311%
Celeron 2957U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.54

Core i3-4160 outperforms Celeron 2957U by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18432854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.893.40
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$133$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data+
FDIno data-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1610
PCI supportno data-
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4160 2.22
+311%
Celeron 2957U 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4160 3521
+312%
Celeron 2957U 855

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.22 0.54
Integrated graphics card 1.35 0.77
Recency 21 July 2014 1 January 2014
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

i3-4160 has a 311.1% higher aggregate performance score, 75.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% more threads.

Celeron 2957U, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2957U in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4160 is a desktop processor while Celeron 2957U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4160 and Celeron 2957U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4160
Core i3-4160
Intel Celeron 2957U
Celeron 2957U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 907 votes

Rate Core i3-4160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 70 votes

Rate Celeron 2957U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4160 or Celeron 2957U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.