Xeon MP 3.66 vs i3-4102E
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cranford (2005) |
| Release date | 4 September 2013 (11 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1364 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 135 Watt |
i3-4102E has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 440% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i3-4102E is a notebook processor while Xeon MP 3.66 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4102E and Xeon MP 3.66, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
