Phenom X3 8750 vs i3-350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-330M Core i3-350M Core i3-370M Core i3-380M Core i5-430M Core i5-460M Core i5-480M Core i5-520M Core i5-560M Core i7-620M Core i7-640M Pentium P6200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Phenom X3 8250e Phenom X3 8400 Phenom X3 8450 Phenom X3 8450e Phenom X3 8550 Phenom X3 8600 Phenom X3 8650 Phenom X3 8750 Phenom X3 8750 BE Phenom X3 8850 Phenom X4 9550 Phenom X4 9650

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.68
Phenom X3 8750
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.91
+33.8%

Phenom X3 8750 outperforms Core i3-350M by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

i3-350M i3-350M
Phenom X3 8750 Phenom X3 8750

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27182526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency1.840.91
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Toliman (2008)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81+114 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGAno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.68
Phenom X3 8750 0.91
+33.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-350M 1086
Phenom X3 8750 1445
+33.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-350M 293
Phenom X3 8750 301
+2.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-350M 594
Phenom X3 8750 782
+31.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.68 0.91
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

i3-350M has 33.3% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Phenom X3 8750, on the other hand, has a 33.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

The Phenom X3 8750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-350M is a notebook processor while Phenom X3 8750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Phenom X3 8750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
AMD Phenom X3 8750
Phenom X3 8750
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-350M Core i3 350M
vs
Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9600
Phenom X3 8750 Phenom X3 8750
vs
Pentium G850 Pentium G850
i3-350M Core i3 350M
vs
A4 Micro-6400T A4 Micro 6400T
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Core 2 Quad Q6600
vs
A4-6210 A4 6210
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Core 2 Quad Q6600
vs
i7-9700 Core i7 9700
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Core 2 Quad Q6600
vs
Ryzen 5 3400G Ryzen 5 3400G
Core 2 Quad Q9100 Core 2 Quad Q9100
vs
Celeron B710 Celeron B710
i3-350M Core i3 350M
vs
Phenom X3 8450e Phenom X3 8450e
Core 2 Duo E6600 Core 2 Duo E6600
vs
i3-560 Core i3 560
i3-330M Core i3 330M
vs
i3-12100F Core i3 12100F
Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
Celeron 3215U Celeron 3215U
Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
Celeron N3160 Celeron N3160
Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo P8600
vs
i3-1115G4 Core i3 1115G4

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 264 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 70 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Phenom X3 8750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.