Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i3-3240T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3240T
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.31
Ryzen 9 3900XT
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
21.15
+1515%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms i3-3240T by a whopping 1515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2176236
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0444.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Matisse 2 (2020)
Release date3 September 2012 (11 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499
Current price$26 $355 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3900XT has 111850% better value for money than i3-3240T.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)768 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size94 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT.

PCIe version2.04.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3240T 1.31
Ryzen 9 3900XT 21.15
+1515%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-3240T by 1515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3240T 2025
Ryzen 9 3900XT 32706
+1515%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-3240T by 1515% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3240T 467
Ryzen 9 3900XT 1734
+271%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-3240T by 271% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3240T 1012
Ryzen 9 3900XT 10072
+895%

Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-3240T by 895% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 21.15
Recency 3 September 2012 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 9 3900XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3240T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240T and Ryzen 9 3900XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240T
Core i3-3240T
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9 votes

Rate Core i3-3240T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 406 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3240T or Ryzen 9 3900XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.