Celeron N2830 vs Core i3-3229Y

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2622not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-YBay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$107
Current priceno data$234 (2.2x MSRP)

Detailed Specifications

Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency850 MHz750 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3229Y 1004
+82.9%
Celeron N2830 549

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 83% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3229Y 242
+48.5%
Celeron N2830 163

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 48% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3229Y 546
+96.4%
Celeron N2830 278

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 96% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-3229Y 1870
+57.8%
Celeron N2830 1185

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 58% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-3229Y 3740
+67%
Celeron N2830 2240

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 67% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-3229Y 1
+50%
Celeron N2830 1

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 50% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-3229Y 0.5
+16.3%
Celeron N2830 0.43

Core i3-3229Y outperforms Celeron N2830 by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 8 January 2013 23 February 2014
Threads 4 2
Cost $250 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3229Y and Celeron N2830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3229Y
Core i3-3229Y
Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i3-3229Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 204 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3229Y or Celeron N2830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.