Core i3-1305U vs Core i3-3210
Aggregate performance score
i3-1305U outperforms i3-3210 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2112 | 1063 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Raptor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Raptor Lake-U |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $120 | no data |
| Current price | $70 (0.6x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 464 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 3.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 10 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1155 | BGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 2500 | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-1305U outperforms Core i3-3210 by 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-1305U outperforms Core i3-3210 by 304% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.44 | 5.81 |
| Recency | 1 January 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 5 |
| Threads | 4 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
i3-1305U has a 303.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 150% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-1305U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3210 in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-3210 is a desktop processor while Core i3-1305U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3210 and Core i3-1305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
