A6-9220e vs Core i3-3130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3130M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.23
+95.2%

i3-3130M outperforms A6-9220e by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22362673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$136 (0.6x MSRP)$308

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size118 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90C (PGA); 105C (BGA)90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI-no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3130M 1.23
+95.2%
A6-9220e 0.63

Core i3-3130M outperforms A6-9220e by 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3130M 1900
+95.7%
A6-9220e 971

Core i3-3130M outperforms A6-9220e by 96% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.63
Integrated graphics card 1.18 1.17
Recency 1 January 2013 1 June 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

The Core i3-3130M is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3130M and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3130M
Core i3-3130M
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate Core i3-3130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 305 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3130M or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.