Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs i3-2367M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-2310M Core i3-2330M Core i3-2350M Core i5-2410M Core i5-2430M Core i5-2450M Core i5-2520M Core i5-2540M Core i7-2630QM Core i7-2640M Core i7-2670QM Pentium B960
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2367M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.59
+11.3%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Core i3-2367M by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

i3-2367M i3-2367M
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28462802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.950.45
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 October 2011 (13 years ago)August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512K
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size149 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023AM2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2367M 0.53
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.59
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2367M 847
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 930
+9.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-2367M 223
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 241
+8.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-2367M 477
+13.8%
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 419

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.53 0.59
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

i3-2367M has 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2367M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2367M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2367M and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-2367M
Core i3-2367M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-2367M Core i3 2367M
vs
Celeron 1007U Celeron 1007U
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+
vs
Celeron E3500 Celeron E3500
i3-2367M Core i3 2367M
vs
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
i7-2700K Core i7 2700K
vs
Phenom II X4 960T BE Phenom II X4 960T BE
Celeron 2955U Celeron 2955U
vs
i5-12450H Core i5 12450H
Celeron B800 Celeron B800
vs
i3-12100F Core i3 12100F
A6-3410MX A6 3410MX
vs
Celeron N5095 Celeron N5095
i7-3610QM Core i7 3610QM
vs
Pentium Gold 4417U Pentium Gold 4417U
Celeron 430 Celeron 430
vs
Ryzen 7 5700X Ryzen 7 5700X
i5-2520M Core i5 2520M
vs
Turion II M560 Turion II M560
A12-9700P A12 9700P
vs
A9-9425 A9 9425
A4-4300M A4 4300M
vs
Pentium 4415U Pentium 4415U
A12-9700P A12 9700P
vs
i7-8750H Core i7 8750H

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 43 votes

Rate Core i3-2367M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 313 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2367M or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.