Pentium N3530 vs i3-2310E

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2310E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.16
+54.7%
Pentium N3530
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.75

Core i3-2310E outperforms Pentium N3530 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23662650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Pentium
Power efficiency3.149.46
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA1023FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data896 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2310E 1.16
+54.7%
Pentium N3530 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2310E 1845
+54.7%
Pentium N3530 1193

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 0.75
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.77
Recency 1 February 2011 23 February 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

i3-2310E has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium N3530, on the other hand, has 16.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-2310E is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310E and Pentium N3530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2310E
Core i3-2310E
Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Core i3-2310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 171 vote

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2310E or Pentium N3530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.