Xeon W-1350 vs Core i3-2100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2100
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.20
Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
12.29
+924%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms i3-2100 by a whopping 924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2256584
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2898.12
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$73no data
Current price$70 (1x MSRP)$177

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 34943% better value for money than i3-2100.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2000Intel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2100 1.20
Xeon W-1350 12.29
+924%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Core i3-2100 by 924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-2100 1849
Xeon W-1350 19015
+928%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Core i3-2100 by 928% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2100 468
Xeon W-1350 2154
+360%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Core i3-2100 by 360% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2100 958
Xeon W-1350 8202
+756%

Xeon W-1350 outperforms Core i3-2100 by 756% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 12.29
Recency 20 February 2011 1 April 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon W-1350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2100 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-2100 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2100 and Xeon W-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2100
Core i3-2100
Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1897 votes

Rate Core i3-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 20 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2100 or Xeon W-1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.