Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs Core i3-10105F
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1056 | 1216 |
| Place by popularity | 53 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 46.14 | 4.12 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | $96 | $207 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-10105F has 1020% better value for money than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| SIPP | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 by 24% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 by 37% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.82 | 4.68 |
| Recency | 16 March 2021 | 29 June 2017 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
