Xeon w7-3565X vs i3-10100F

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.62
Xeon w7-3565X
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 335 Watt
49.17
+775%

Xeon w7-3565X outperforms Core i3-10100F by a whopping 775% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking114736
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.1249.46
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.0313.63
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date12 October 2020 (4 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$2,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w7-3565X has 146% better value for money than i3-10100F.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB82.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size126 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt335 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10100F 5.62
Xeon w7-3565X 49.17
+775%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10100F 8758
Xeon w7-3565X 76649
+775%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.62 49.17
Recency 12 October 2020 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 335 Watt

i3-10100F has 415.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3565X, on the other hand, has a 774.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon w7-3565X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10100F in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10100F is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3565X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10100F and Xeon w7-3565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F
Intel Xeon w7-3565X
Xeon w7-3565X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7559 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3565X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10100F or Xeon w7-3565X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.