Ultra 5 125H vs Ultra 9 285H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Core Ultra 5 125H by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 257 | 529 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-H |
| Power efficiency | 44.75 | 47.35 |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| Release date | no data | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $375 |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 18 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | Intel 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 96 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® Arc™ graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 2.2 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.28 | 14.01 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 18 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has a 51.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 14.3% more physical cores.
Ultra 5 125H, on the other hand, has 12.5% more threads, and 60.7% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 125H in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and Core Ultra 5 125H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
