Ultra 5 250K Plus vs Ultra 7 270K Plus

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake Refresh (2026)Arrow Lake Refresh (2026)
Release date11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)11 March 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299$199

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads2418
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket18511851
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
SIPP++

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2424

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 68292
+28.3%
Samples: 123
Ultra 5 250K Plus 53235
Samples: 12

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 12623
+5.9%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 11921

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 102789
+9.8%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 93637

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 2.33
+41.2%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 3.29

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 6656
+43.4%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 4640

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 354
+7.9%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 328

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 7 270K Plus 17.7
+0.6%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 17.6

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 7 270K Plus 429
+4.9%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 409

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 7 270K Plus 304
+19.2%
Ultra 5 250K Plus 255

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 18
Threads 24 18

Ultra 7 270K Plus has 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 65 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 270K Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 250K Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.