Celeron M 390 vs Ultra 7 155H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 8147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 574 | 3528 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 23.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 21.27 | 0.34 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $503 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 6 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 2 | no data |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 96 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ graphics | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.25 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron M 390.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.02 | 0.17 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 21 Watt |
Ultra 7 155H has a 8147.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 390 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
