Ultra 7 268V vs Celeron M 390
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | no data | 24 September 2024 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 1.004V-1.292V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Arc 140V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ultra 7 268V has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 23.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 390 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
