Atom D2560 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.66
+5700%
Atom D2560
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.27

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Atom D2560 by a whopping 5700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4353144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Atom
Power efficiency53.302.57
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)24 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads224
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.91V -1.21V

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 2049FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.66
+5700%
Atom D2560 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25078
+5692%
Atom D2560 433

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.66 0.27
Recency 14 December 2023 24 October 2012
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 10 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 5700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 450% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D2560, on the other hand, has 180% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D2560 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Atom D2560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Atom D2560
Atom D2560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 597 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom D2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Atom D2560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.