Xeon w5-3525 vs Solo U1400

Aggregate performance score

Core Solo U1400
1 core / 1 thread, 6 Watt
0.08
Xeon w5-3525
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 290 Watt
30.66
+38225%

Xeon w5-3525 outperforms Core Solo U1400 by a whopping 38225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3464149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.58
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiency1.3910.10
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data16
Threads132
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 KB45 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Solo U1400 0.08
Xeon w5-3525 30.66
+38225%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Solo U1400 130
Xeon w5-3525 49190
+37738%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 30.66
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 290 Watt

Solo U1400 has 4733.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-3525, on the other hand, has a 38225% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon w5-3525 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Solo U1400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Solo U1400 is a notebook processor while Xeon w5-3525 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo U1400
Core Solo U1400
Intel Xeon w5-3525
Xeon w5-3525

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Core Solo U1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-3525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Solo U1400 and Xeon w5-3525, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.