Solo U1400 vs C-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

C-30
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 9 Watt
0.11
+37.5%
Core Solo U1400
1 core / 1 thread, 6 Watt
0.08

C-30 outperforms Core Solo U1400 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing C-30 and Core Solo U1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33713398
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD C-SeriesCore Solo
Power efficiency1.161.38
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

C-30 and Core Solo U1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V - 1.1V

Compatibility

Information on C-30 and Core Solo U1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallPBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Core Solo U1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions40 nm, 1.24-1.35Vno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

C-30 and Core Solo U1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Core Solo U1400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Core Solo U1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6250no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

C-30 0.11
+37.5%
Solo U1400 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-30 178
+36.9%
Solo U1400 130

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.08
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 6 Watt

C-30 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

Solo U1400, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The C-30 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo U1400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Core Solo U1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-30
C-30
Intel Core Solo U1400
Core Solo U1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Core Solo U1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-30 or Core Solo U1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.