Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Core Solo T1400
Primary details
Comparing Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 32 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 21.76 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Core Solo | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| Release date | January 2006 (18 years ago) | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $41 | $2220 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 90 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 151 million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.1625V - 1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478, PBGA479 | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Core Solo T1400 by 29822% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 280 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Solo T1400 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1400 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
