Xeon W-3275M vs Core Solo T1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore SoloIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,453
Current price$7.34 $9030 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support533 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache2 MB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C76 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Solo T1350 194
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+20433%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core Solo T1350 by 20433% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 205 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1350 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.