i3-10100F vs Solo T1350

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1147
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.13
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Solono data
Power efficiencyno data8.02
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Comet Lake (2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)12 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors151 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.95V-1.262Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Solo T1350 194
i3-10100F 8757
+4414%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Solo T1350 has 109.7% lower power consumption.

i3-10100F, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1350 is a notebook processor while Core i3-10100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1350 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7561 vote

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1350 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.