VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs Celeron M 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3313not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MC7-M
Power efficiency0.49no data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Esther
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz533 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt20 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 20 Watt

Celeron M 450 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, on the other hand, has 35% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 450
Celeron M 450
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000
C7-M C7-M-2000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 13 votes

Rate Celeron M 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 450 or VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.