VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 vs Celeron M 450
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3313 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | C7-M |
Power efficiency | 0.49 | no data |
Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | Esther |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
L3 cache | 1 MB L2 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 20 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 20 Watt |
Celeron M 450 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, on the other hand, has 35% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 450 and VIA C7-M C7-M-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.