Ryzen 3 1100 vs Solo T1200

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCore Solono data
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size90 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors151 million4800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket479AM4
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 65 Watt

Solo T1200 has 140.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 1100, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Solo T1200 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 1100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Ryzen 3 1100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200
AMD Ryzen 3 1100
Ryzen 3 1100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 15 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1200 or Ryzen 3 1100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.