A6-9210 vs M-5Y70

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y70
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.17
+46.3%
A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80

Core M-5Y70 outperforms A6-9210 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23692616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency21.734.95
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size50 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1234FP4
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Virtualization,
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.3no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y70 1.17
+46.3%
A6-9210 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y70 1823
+46.1%
A6-9210 1248

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

M-5Y70 507
+52.7%
A6-9210 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

M-5Y70 888
+71.4%
A6-9210 518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.80
Recency 5 September 2014 1 June 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

M-5Y70 has a 46.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

A6-9210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core M-5Y70 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y70 and A6-9210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y70
Core M-5Y70
AMD A6-9210
A6-9210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Core M-5Y70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y70 or A6-9210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.