Xeon Gold 5512U vs Core M-5Y51
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5512U outperforms M-5Y51 by a whopping 2919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2238 | 71 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2014−2019) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 1 December 2014 (9 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 52.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 89 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1234 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 80 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.29 | 38.94 |
| Recency | 1 December 2014 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 185 Watt |
M-5Y51 has 4525% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has a 2918.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Gold 5512U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core M-5Y51 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core M-5Y51 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5512U is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y51 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
