Xeon Gold 5217 vs 7 230H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 7 230H
2026
10 cores / 16 threads
14.33
+64.1%
Xeon Gold 5217
2019, $1,522
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.73

Core 7 230H outperforms Xeon Gold 5217 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6741125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.71
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiencyno data3.14
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-H (2023−2026)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date12 June 2026 (less than a year ago)2 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,522

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache864 KB512 KB
L2 cache9.5 MB8 MB
L3 cache24 MB11 MB
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1700FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

7 230H 14.33
+64.1%
Xeon Gold 5217 8.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

7 230H 24533
+64.2%
Samples: 3
Xeon Gold 5217 14945
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.33 8.73
Recency 12 June 2026 2 April 2019
Physical cores 10 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

7 230H has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core 7 230H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 5217 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 7 230H is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5217 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 230H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5217 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 7 230H and Xeon Gold 5217, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.