Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs Core 2 Solo SU3500
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 21159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3283 | 99 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Power efficiency | 2.93 | 62.19 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) | 27 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 89 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 36.14 |
| Recency | 1 April 2009 | 27 July 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 55 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 1000% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, on the other hand, has a 21158.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
