Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs A4-3300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A4-3300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads
0.62
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads
3.21
+418%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A4-3300 by a whopping 418% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26571502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.725.54
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Thuban (2010)
Release date7 September 2011 (12 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$40 $50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 49% better value for money than A4-3300.

Detailed specifications

A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2346 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6410Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300 0.62
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.21
+418%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A4-3300 by 418% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-3300 962
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+416%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A4-3300 by 416% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 3.21
Recency 7 September 2011 1 May 2010
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300
A4-3300
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 100 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1545 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.